0:00:00.191,0:00:02.980 ♪ [music] ♪ 0:00:08.928,0:00:10.359 - [Alex] In the next two videos, 0:00:10.359,0:00:13.498 we'll turn our attention [br]to price floors and their effects. 0:00:13.498,0:00:15.900 In this video, we'll look at [br]the first two effects 0:00:15.900,0:00:18.577 and cover one of the most [br]well-known price floors: 0:00:18.577,0:00:19.919 the minimum wage. 0:00:19.919,0:00:21.759 Let's get started. 0:00:25.300,0:00:29.019 A price floor is a minimum price [br]allowed by law. 0:00:29.019,0:00:32.278 That is, it is a price [br]below which it is illegal 0:00:32.278,0:00:33.910 to buy or sell, 0:00:33.910,0:00:35.006 called a price floor 0:00:35.006,0:00:38.296 because you cannot go[br]below the floor. 0:00:39.006,0:00:40.489 We're going to show [br]that price floors 0:00:40.489,0:00:42.437 create four significant effects: 0:00:42.437,0:00:49.436 surpluses, lost gains from trade, [br]wasteful increases in quality, 0:00:49.436,0:00:51.357 and a misallocation of resources. 0:00:51.357,0:00:53.068 We're going to go through [br]these each in turn. 0:00:53.068,0:00:54.568 Before we do so, however, 0:00:54.568,0:00:57.293 it's worthwhile[br]asking this question: 0:00:57.293,0:01:00.871 price floors are less common [br]than price ceilings -- 0:01:00.871,0:01:02.230 why is this? 0:01:02.230,0:01:06.100 That is, it's more common [br]to see a price being held 0:01:06.100,0:01:09.139 below the market price, 0:01:09.139,0:01:14.319 than it is to see a price [br]being held above the market price. 0:01:15.069,0:01:16.189 Why? 0:01:17.108,0:01:19.279 One reason may be political. 0:01:19.279,0:01:23.740 That is, there are typically[br]more buyers of goods 0:01:23.740,0:01:26.862 than there are sellers of goods. 0:01:26.862,0:01:30.568 So when you hold a price [br]below the market price, 0:01:30.568,0:01:33.589 you may benefit, or at least [br]appear to benefit, 0:01:33.589,0:01:37.801 more buyers,[br]more people, more voters 0:01:37.801,0:01:42.019 than when you hold a price [br]above the market price, 0:01:42.019,0:01:45.152 which would appear to harm buyers. 0:01:45.152,0:01:47.799 Now interestingly,[br]the paradigmatic, 0:01:47.799,0:01:50.238 the classic case of a price floor 0:01:50.238,0:01:53.159 is the exception[br]which proves the rule. 0:01:53.159,0:01:56.768 Because the classic case [br]of a price floor is a good 0:01:56.768,0:02:01.679 for which there are more sellers [br]than there are buyers. 0:02:01.679,0:02:06.420 So here's the case where the price [br]is kept above the market price, 0:02:06.420,0:02:10.259 and it make sense politically [br]because there are lots of sellers 0:02:10.259,0:02:12.018 compared to buyers. 0:02:12.018,0:02:16.268 So, what is this good,[br]for which price floor is common 0:02:16.268,0:02:19.179 and for which sellers exceed buyers? 0:02:19.179,0:02:21.049 We'll get to that in just a moment. 0:02:21.049,0:02:22.440 Think about it. 0:02:22.440,0:02:24.488 So one of the things [br]which a price floor does 0:02:24.488,0:02:26.508 is it creates surpluses. 0:02:26.508,0:02:30.369 Okay. Have you thought of the good[br]which a price floor is common, 0:02:30.369,0:02:32.629 and it's a good for which [br]the number of suppliers 0:02:32.629,0:02:34.941 exceeds the number of buyers? 0:02:35.631,0:02:38.929 Well, the minimum wage [br]is a price floor. 0:02:38.929,0:02:44.201 The minimum wage is a price [br]below which you cannot sell labor, 0:02:44.201,0:02:47.879 and the suppliers of labor [br]exceed the buyers of labor. 0:02:47.879,0:02:50.230 So it's not surprising[br]that a minimum wage 0:02:50.230,0:02:52.798 is often politically successful. 0:02:52.798,0:02:54.970 Now, who will[br]the minimum wage affect? 0:02:54.970,0:02:56.760 Workers with very high productivity 0:02:56.760,0:02:58.870 who are already earning[br]more than the minimum wage – 0:02:58.870,0:03:01.983 they are not going to be affected [br]by the minimum wage perhaps at all. 0:03:01.983,0:03:04.373 Instead, it will affect [br]the least experienced, 0:03:04.373,0:03:07.290 least educated, least trained workers. 0:03:07.290,0:03:11.091 Low-skilled teenagers, for example, [br]are most likely to be affected 0:03:11.091,0:03:12.889 by the minimum wage. 0:03:12.889,0:03:16.482 Now, I said that a price floor[br]creates surpluses. 0:03:16.482,0:03:20.152 The minimum wage is a price floor,[br]so it's going to create a surplus. 0:03:20.152,0:03:23.264 A surplus of labor, we call what? 0:03:23.264,0:03:24.854 We say a gaggle of geese? 0:03:24.854,0:03:26.531 Say pride of lions? 0:03:26.531,0:03:30.432 A surplus of labor[br]is called unemployment. 0:03:30.432,0:03:32.225 So let's look with our model 0:03:32.225,0:03:36.100 to understand how a minimum wage[br]can create unemployment, 0:03:36.100,0:03:39.454 particularly among[br]the least skilled workers. 0:03:39.454,0:03:41.125 Okay. Here's our standard diagram, 0:03:41.125,0:03:43.071 except we're going to put [br]the quantity of labor, 0:03:43.071,0:03:46.001 especially unskilled labor,[br]on the horizontal axis. 0:03:46.001,0:03:48.930 The wage or the price of labor [br]on the vertical axis -- 0:03:48.930,0:03:50.271 there's our supply curve. 0:03:50.271,0:03:53.238 There's our demand curve[br]with the market wage 0:03:53.238,0:03:55.121 and the market employment level. 0:03:55.121,0:03:56.757 Now we're going to add[br]the minimum wage. 0:03:56.757,0:03:58.041 This is a price floor 0:03:58.041,0:04:03.341 below which it is illegal to buy [br]or sell this good: labor. 0:04:03.341,0:04:07.150 Now we just read the consequences [br]of the price floor of the diagram. 0:04:07.150,0:04:08.458 So we read, for example, 0:04:08.458,0:04:13.311 that at the minimum wage, [br]the quantity of labor demanded 0:04:13.311,0:04:15.059 is read off the demand curve. 0:04:15.059,0:04:17.321 Remember, this is[br]the demand for labor. 0:04:17.321,0:04:20.036 So this is the quantity[br]of labor demanded, 0:04:20.036,0:04:23.341 and at the minimum wage, [br]the quantity of labor supplied 0:04:23.341,0:04:25.603 is read off the supply curve. 0:04:25.603,0:04:28.550 Let's put that point on,[br]that's "Qs." 0:04:28.550,0:04:31.820 So we have Qs units[br]of labor supplied, 0:04:31.820,0:04:34.659 "Qd" units of labor demanded. 0:04:34.659,0:04:36.941 Qs is bigger than Qd, 0:04:36.941,0:04:41.740 so the difference between them [br]is a surplus of labor, 0:04:41.740,0:04:44.749 also known as unemployment. 0:04:46.889,0:04:48.882 Now the minimum wage[br]is a controversial 0:04:48.882,0:04:51.272 and hotly debated issue. 0:04:51.272,0:04:53.381 Some academic results indicate 0:04:53.381,0:04:56.120 that the unemployment effect [br]of a modest increase 0:04:56.120,0:04:57.294 in the minimum wage 0:04:57.294,0:04:59.632 would not be substantial. 0:04:59.632,0:05:02.452 At the same time, however, [br]we also have to recognize 0:05:02.452,0:05:04.882 that a modest increase[br]in the minimum wage 0:05:04.882,0:05:07.344 would not have big benefits either. 0:05:07.344,0:05:09.300 First, only a small percentage[br]of workers 0:05:09.300,0:05:11.424 are going to be affected[br]by the minimum wage. 0:05:11.424,0:05:17.003 97% or so of workers already earn [br]more than the minimum wage. 0:05:17.003,0:05:19.141 In fact, even among young workers, 0:05:19.141,0:05:22.522 94% or so less than 25 years of age, 0:05:22.522,0:05:25.072 they already earn[br]more than the minimum wage. 0:05:25.072,0:05:28.062 At best, the minimum wage [br]will raise the wages 0:05:28.062,0:05:30.352 of some low-skilled[br]and young workers, 0:05:30.352,0:05:33.382 most of whose wages [br]would have increased anyway 0:05:33.382,0:05:35.942 as they became more skilled. 0:05:35.942,0:05:37.331 At worst, the minimum wage 0:05:37.331,0:05:39.240 will increase the price[br]of a hamburger, 0:05:39.240,0:05:41.522 create some unemployment, 0:05:41.522,0:05:45.412 and/or keep some teenagers [br]in school for a bit longer -- 0:05:45.412,0:05:48.112 not all necessarily bad things. 0:05:48.622,0:05:49.652 What, however, 0:05:49.652,0:05:52.222 about a larger increase [br]in the minimum wage? 0:05:53.053,0:05:54.403 Few economists doubt 0:05:54.403,0:05:56.352 that a large increase[br]in the minimum wage 0:05:56.352,0:05:59.294 would cause serious unemployment. 0:05:59.294,0:06:03.142 After all, we could[br]not create prosperity 0:06:03.142,0:06:05.692 by raising the minimum wage [br]higher and higher. 0:06:05.692,0:06:08.364 If a minimum wage of $10[br]an hour is a good idea, 0:06:08.364,0:06:09.582 what about 15? 0:06:09.582,0:06:11.892 What about 20, 25, $100? 0:06:11.892,0:06:13.753 $500 an hour? 0:06:13.753,0:06:15.663 Would we all be rich at that point? 0:06:15.663,0:06:18.861 Would we all be receiving wages [br]of $500 an hour? 0:06:18.861,0:06:19.924 Of course not. 0:06:19.924,0:06:22.561 Most of us would be unemployed. 0:06:22.561,0:06:24.501 So a large increase[br]in the minimum wage 0:06:24.501,0:06:26.215 is going to cause[br]serious unemployment, 0:06:26.215,0:06:29.683 and the good example of this [br]is Puerto Rico in 1938. 0:06:29.683,0:06:32.833 Congress actually set [br]the first minimum wage at this time 0:06:32.833,0:06:35.184 at 25 cents an hour. 0:06:35.184,0:06:36.985 Now that may seem low,[br]but that's at a time 0:06:36.985,0:06:39.374 when the average wage[br]in the United States 0:06:39.374,0:06:41.393 was still less than[br]a dollar an hour, 0:06:41.393,0:06:44.203 was 62 and a half cents an hour. 0:06:44.203,0:06:47.483 Congress, however,[br]forgot to exempt Puerto Rico, 0:06:47.483,0:06:50.283 when the average wages [br]in Puerto Rico at that time 0:06:50.283,0:06:53.626 were much lower than in the rest [br]of the United States, 0:06:53.626,0:06:56.124 only three cents[br]to four cents an hour. 0:06:56.124,0:06:59.434 So this modest increase [br]in the minimum wage 0:06:59.434,0:07:01.933 for the continental United States 0:07:01.933,0:07:05.486 was a huge increase[br]in the minimum wage for Puerto Rico. 0:07:05.486,0:07:08.466 And lots of Puerto Rican firms[br]went bankrupt, 0:07:08.466,0:07:10.651 it created devastating unemployment. 0:07:10.651,0:07:14.225 In fact, Puerto Rican politicians [br]came to Washington 0:07:14.225,0:07:18.844 to beg for an exemption [br]to get them out of the minimum wage. 0:07:18.844,0:07:21.063 So, a large increase[br]in the minimum wage 0:07:21.063,0:07:25.843 would certainly cause substantial [br]and serious unemployment. 0:07:25.843,0:07:28.293 We do see higher minimum wages [br]in other countries. 0:07:28.293,0:07:31.213 The minimum wage in France [br]is higher than the U.S., 0:07:31.213,0:07:34.204 relative to average wages [br]in those two countries. 0:07:34.204,0:07:36.144 In addition, labor laws in France 0:07:36.144,0:07:38.534 make it very difficult[br]to fire workers 0:07:38.534,0:07:40.555 once they have been hired. 0:07:40.555,0:07:42.136 As a result, firms in France 0:07:42.136,0:07:45.755 are very reluctant[br]to hire new workers. 0:07:45.755,0:07:48.106 Younger workers[br]are especially affected 0:07:48.106,0:07:49.965 because they are less productive, 0:07:49.965,0:07:52.724 and also they are[br]less known commodities. 0:07:52.724,0:07:55.515 So, the risk[br]of hiring them is greater. 0:07:55.515,0:07:58.807 As a result, unemployment[br]among young workers 0:07:58.807,0:08:00.366 is very high in France. 0:08:00.366,0:08:03.526 It was 23% in 2005, 0:08:03.526,0:08:06.555 and that was long before [br]the economic crisis, 0:08:06.555,0:08:09.583 the financial crisis [br]affecting the entire world. 0:08:09.583,0:08:11.366 So even during good times, 0:08:11.366,0:08:15.617 unemployment in France [br]among young workers is very high, 0:08:15.617,0:08:17.233 because the minimum wage is high, 0:08:17.233,0:08:19.718 and because firms[br]don't want to hire, 0:08:19.718,0:08:23.218 given how difficult it is [br]to fire workers. 0:08:23.218,0:08:25.217 Okay. Let's also show[br]that the minimum wage 0:08:25.217,0:08:26.997 creates lost gains from trade -- 0:08:26.997,0:08:29.309 this ought to be[br]fairly familiar by now. 0:08:29.309,0:08:32.027 At the minimum wage, [br]the quantity of labor demanded 0:08:32.027,0:08:34.147 is given by Qd. 0:08:34.147,0:08:38.056 That is less than the quantity [br]of labor which would be traded, 0:08:38.056,0:08:41.918 given the market wage,[br]this market employment. 0:08:41.918,0:08:46.728 Key point is that [br]there are buyers of labor 0:08:46.728,0:08:51.267 who are willing to buy labor [br]at a price below the minimum wage, 0:08:51.267,0:08:53.610 and there are suppliers of labor, 0:08:53.610,0:08:57.634 workers who are willing [br]to work below the minimum wage. 0:08:57.634,0:09:00.718 These deals would be[br]mutually profitable, 0:09:00.718,0:09:02.900 but they are illegal. 0:09:02.900,0:09:05.640 So there are buyers of labor 0:09:05.640,0:09:07.678 who are willing to buy below [br]the minimum wage, 0:09:07.678,0:09:09.448 there are sellers willing to sell. 0:09:09.448,0:09:11.840 These deals would be[br]mutually profitable, 0:09:11.840,0:09:13.770 but they are illegal,[br]they are not made. 0:09:13.770,0:09:16.459 Because of that,[br]there are lost gains from trade, 0:09:16.459,0:09:18.651 or a deadweight loss. 0:09:18.651,0:09:21.680 Okay. So, we have covered [br]the first two effects of price floors, 0:09:21.680,0:09:24.969 namely surpluses [br]and lost gains from trade. 0:09:24.969,0:09:27.999 In the next lecture, we will use [br]a slightly different example 0:09:27.999,0:09:30.170 to look at wasteful[br]increases in quality 0:09:30.170,0:09:32.600 and a misallocation of resources. 0:09:33.610,0:09:35.050 - [Narrator] If you want[br]to test yourself, 0:09:35.050,0:09:36.686 click "Practice Questions." 0:09:37.296,0:09:40.760 Or, if you're ready to move on, [br]just click "Next Video." 0:09:40.760,0:09:43.254 ♪ [music] ♪