1 00:00:12,480 --> 00:00:15,021 I’ve been asked to say a few words 2 00:00:15,021 --> 00:00:20,411 about the global shift in power in politics. 3 00:00:20,411 --> 00:00:23,850 That's a hotly debated topic these days. 4 00:00:23,850 --> 00:00:27,858 There’s a great deal of speculation about 5 00:00:27,858 --> 00:00:32,230 whether or when China will displace the United States 6 00:00:32,230 --> 00:00:34,480 as the dominant global power, 7 00:00:34,480 --> 00:00:36,630 perhaps along with India, 8 00:00:36,630 --> 00:00:41,340 which if true would mean that the global system would be returning 9 00:00:41,340 --> 00:00:46,242 to something like what it was before the European conquests, 10 00:00:46,242 --> 00:00:48,673 primarily from the 17th century. 11 00:00:48,673 --> 00:00:53,040 Just to illustrate the mood with unscientific 12 00:00:53,040 --> 00:00:56,180 but probably representative sample, 13 00:00:56,180 --> 00:01:01,047 I was talking recently to a professor of history 14 00:01:01,047 --> 00:01:04,291 at one of the Massachusetts' state colleges, 15 00:01:04,291 --> 00:01:09,099 who told me that at the beginning of every semester she asks 16 00:01:09,099 --> 00:01:13,640 her students what they think are the richest countries in the world. 17 00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:18,740 And for the last few years, they've been regularly saying China and India. 18 00:01:18,740 --> 00:01:22,898 Well, you could believe that if you read the headlines. 19 00:01:22,898 --> 00:01:26,410 A few qualifications may be in order. 20 00:01:26,410 --> 00:01:30,673 First, what about wealth or the health of the society. 21 00:01:30,673 --> 00:01:33,022 There's a standard measure, 22 00:01:33,022 --> 00:01:37,410 it's the Human Development Index comes out every year. 23 00:01:37,410 --> 00:01:41,278 With the latest release, 24 00:01:41,278 --> 00:01:45,139 India was ranked at 134th, 25 00:01:45,139 --> 00:01:47,570 slightly above Cambodia, 26 00:01:47,570 --> 00:01:51,109 below Laos and Tajikistan. 27 00:01:51,109 --> 00:01:54,230 That's about where it was several decades ago. 28 00:01:54,230 --> 00:01:57,822 China was ranked 92nd. 29 00:01:57,822 --> 00:02:00,310 But that's a little uncertain 30 00:02:00,310 --> 00:02:02,539 since the poor areas of China 31 00:02:02,539 --> 00:02:05,645 are not very accessible in this more closed society. 32 00:02:05,645 --> 00:02:07,706 So it could be lower. 33 00:02:07,706 --> 00:02:10,260 Where it's ranked it's tied with Belize 34 00:02:10,260 --> 00:02:12,480 as slightly above Jordan 35 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:15,806 and below the Dominican Republic and Iran. 36 00:02:15,806 --> 00:02:17,680 By comparison, 37 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:20,860 Cuba, which has been under harsh US attack 38 00:02:20,860 --> 00:02:24,875 for 50 years is ranked 52nd. 39 00:02:24,875 --> 00:02:27,217 It's above both of those, 40 00:02:27,217 --> 00:02:30,460 also the highest in the Central America and the Caribbean, 41 00:02:30,460 --> 00:02:33,536 barely below Argentina and Uruguay. 42 00:02:33,536 --> 00:02:38,370 India and China also have extraordinarily high inequalities, 43 00:02:38,370 --> 00:02:39,970 some of the worst in the world. 44 00:02:39,970 --> 00:02:42,220 So that means a well over a billion people 45 00:02:42,220 --> 00:02:45,300 are much further down in the scale. 46 00:02:45,300 --> 00:02:47,622 Well, what about debt? 47 00:02:47,622 --> 00:02:56,247 Common discussion ideas, it places the United States enthralled to China's whims. 48 00:02:56,247 --> 00:03:00,595 Well, apart from a very brief interlude, which is now over, 49 00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:03,206 Japan has been the biggest holder 50 00:03:03,206 --> 00:03:06,426 of the US government debt. 51 00:03:06,426 --> 00:03:09,589 At best, it’s not much of a weapon 52 00:03:09,589 --> 00:03:13,968 for many reasons that are well understood. 53 00:03:13,968 --> 00:03:15,880 What about prospects? 54 00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:18,650 The United States has enormous advantages 55 00:03:18,650 --> 00:03:21,051 over both Europe and Asia. 56 00:03:21,051 --> 00:03:22,888 For one thing, it's unified, 57 00:03:22,888 --> 00:03:27,185 has a relatively homogeneous population, one language, 58 00:03:27,185 --> 00:03:30,427 a huge internal market and rich resources, 59 00:03:30,427 --> 00:03:33,913 a favorable climate and much more. 60 00:03:33,913 --> 00:03:36,551 What about military power? 61 00:03:36,551 --> 00:03:39,222 Well, here there's just no discussion. 62 00:03:39,222 --> 00:03:43,500 The US is about the same as the rest of the world combined 63 00:03:43,500 --> 00:03:47,130 in military expenditures, much more if we can add intelligence. 64 00:03:47,130 --> 00:03:49,740 Technologically far more advanced. 65 00:03:49,740 --> 00:03:54,167 It's the only country with hundreds of military bases, 66 00:03:54,167 --> 00:03:56,710 maybe 800 military bases abroad, 67 00:03:56,710 --> 00:04:01,402 which in fact are regularly used for the exercise of violence. 68 00:04:01,402 --> 00:04:03,961 So here, there's no comparison. 69 00:04:03,961 --> 00:04:07,880 Actually there’s more fundamental observation. 70 00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:11,636 The entire framework of discussion, though conventional, 71 00:04:11,636 --> 00:04:13,983 is pretty misleading. 72 00:04:13,983 --> 00:04:18,030 The global system is not just an interaction among states, 73 00:04:18,030 --> 00:04:22,180 which pursue some so-called national interest, 74 00:04:22,180 --> 00:04:27,320 which is abstracted from the distribution of domestic power within the society. 75 00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:31,721 That’s the way the matter is usually viewed in commentary 76 00:04:31,721 --> 00:04:37,730 and also in the profession and professional international relations theory. 77 00:04:37,730 --> 00:04:40,275 Largely dominant views called realism -- 78 00:04:40,275 --> 00:04:44,566 views the international system roughly in this fashion. 79 00:04:44,566 --> 00:04:47,789 Now, there have always been critics of this view. 80 00:04:47,789 --> 00:04:51,054 To take one, Adam Smith. 81 00:04:51,054 --> 00:04:54,676 Adam Smith was concerned primarily with England. 82 00:04:54,676 --> 00:04:56,278 And he described -- 83 00:04:56,278 --> 00:04:57,770 He said that in England, 84 00:04:57,770 --> 00:05:02,069 the principal architects of government policy 85 00:05:02,070 --> 00:05:04,773 are merchants and manufacturers 86 00:05:04,773 --> 00:05:07,390 and they make sure that their own interests 87 00:05:07,390 --> 00:05:10,220 are most peculiarly attended to, 88 00:05:10,220 --> 00:05:13,530 however, grievous the impact on others, 89 00:05:13,530 --> 00:05:15,200 including the people of the England, 90 00:05:15,200 --> 00:05:19,175 but of course far worse of those who are subject to 91 00:05:19,175 --> 00:05:22,180 what he called the savage injustice of the Europeans. 92 00:05:22,180 --> 00:05:26,212 He was referring particularly to England and India. 93 00:05:26,212 --> 00:05:30,430 Well, today, pretty much the same maxim holds. 94 00:05:30,430 --> 00:05:32,899 It's not merchants and manufacturers 95 00:05:32,899 --> 00:05:34,981 in the United States and Europe. 96 00:05:34,981 --> 00:05:40,300 It's primarily multinational corporations and financial institutions. 97 00:05:40,300 --> 00:05:44,230 The financialization of the economy has been in a dramatic change 98 00:05:44,230 --> 00:05:47,220 in the last roughly 30 years. 99 00:05:47,220 --> 00:05:50,580 If you go back to about 1970 in the United States, 100 00:05:50,580 --> 00:05:55,250 financial institutions amounted to maybe 3 percent of gross domestic product. 101 00:05:55,250 --> 00:05:57,532 And now it's approaching a third. 102 00:05:57,532 --> 00:06:01,902 Corresponding fact is the hollowing out of productive industry 103 00:06:01,902 --> 00:06:04,673 and that has huge effects on the society, 104 00:06:04,673 --> 00:06:07,310 on political decisions and on the political system 105 00:06:07,310 --> 00:06:10,390 generally keeping to Adam Smith's maxim. 106 00:06:10,390 --> 00:06:13,978 In fact we've just seen a very dramatic illustration of that. 107 00:06:13,978 --> 00:06:18,600 President Obama, who has gained office, 108 00:06:18,600 --> 00:06:22,690 in large measure through the support of the financial industry, 109 00:06:22,690 --> 00:06:24,828 huge component of the economy. 110 00:06:24,828 --> 00:06:29,876 And they preferred him to McCain and that was the core of his funding. 111 00:06:29,876 --> 00:06:32,329 And there was a payoff. 112 00:06:32,329 --> 00:06:35,595 Huge bailouts to the financial institutions 113 00:06:35,595 --> 00:06:38,240 when the system collapsed. 114 00:06:38,240 --> 00:06:40,360 And they were actually much more important gifts 115 00:06:40,360 --> 00:06:42,910 that are not so much discussed. 116 00:06:42,910 --> 00:06:44,700 So takes a Goldman Sachs, 117 00:06:44,700 --> 00:06:47,020 which is considered the top dog 118 00:06:47,020 --> 00:06:50,061 in the economy and the political system. 119 00:06:50,061 --> 00:06:54,290 It made a mint by selling mortgage-based securities 120 00:06:54,290 --> 00:06:57,350 and more complex financial instruments 121 00:06:57,350 --> 00:06:59,290 to unwitting buyers. 122 00:06:59,290 --> 00:07:01,940 But Goldman Sachs itself knew what it was doing. 123 00:07:01,940 --> 00:07:05,171 They knew that they were likely to go bust. 124 00:07:05,171 --> 00:07:09,735 So the company insured itself against loss 125 00:07:09,735 --> 00:07:13,633 by betting that what they're selling would fail 126 00:07:13,633 --> 00:07:16,450 using, what's called, credit default swaps 127 00:07:16,450 --> 00:07:20,340 through giant insurance agency AIG, 128 00:07:20,340 --> 00:07:22,750 the world's biggest insurance agency. 129 00:07:22,750 --> 00:07:24,990 Well, when the financial system collapsed, 130 00:07:24,990 --> 00:07:27,570 it took AIG down with it. 131 00:07:27,570 --> 00:07:32,380 But Goldman's boys are well-placed among the architects of power 132 00:07:32,380 --> 00:07:35,520 and they not only arranged for a huge bailout. 133 00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:38,052 but more importantly, they got the taxpayer 134 00:07:38,052 --> 00:07:45,343 to pay to save AIG from bankruptcy by up their collapsed loans 135 00:07:47,190 --> 00:07:51,364 and that incidentally saved Goldman Sachs from the same fate. 136 00:07:51,364 --> 00:07:55,890 Now, the CEO of Goldman Sachs Lloyd Blankfein 137 00:07:55,890 --> 00:07:59,960 is hailed as maybe the greatest genius since Einstein. 138 00:07:59,960 --> 00:08:02,720 Goldman's making record profits, 139 00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:05,020 paying out huge bonuses. 140 00:08:05,020 --> 00:08:08,620 And the other agents of the financial crisis 141 00:08:08,620 --> 00:08:11,367 are bigger and more powerful than ever. 142 00:08:11,367 --> 00:08:16,246 Well, the public may not understand the details, but they are furious. 143 00:08:16,246 --> 00:08:19,990 The banks that created the crisis are visibly booming, 144 00:08:19,990 --> 00:08:22,403 the population is suffering, 145 00:08:22,403 --> 00:08:26,690 the unemployment is officially at about 10 percent, actually much higher. 146 00:08:26,690 --> 00:08:31,160 In manufacturing industry, it's about the level of the Great Depression. 147 00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:33,160 And those jobs are not coming back 148 00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:37,330 because of the shipping of productive capacity abroad. 149 00:08:37,330 --> 00:08:39,560 In fact, for the last 30 years, 150 00:08:39,560 --> 00:08:42,130 for the majority of the population, 151 00:08:42,150 --> 00:08:46,220 there has been roughly stagnation, sometimes decline, 152 00:08:46,220 --> 00:08:51,770 in the real wages as wealth poured into very few pockets 153 00:08:51,770 --> 00:08:55,180 at highest inequality in US history. 154 00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:56,746 So there's plenty of anger. 155 00:08:56,746 --> 00:09:00,110 And finally President Obama had to react to it. 156 00:09:00,110 --> 00:09:01,690 And he did a couple months ago. 157 00:09:01,690 --> 00:09:04,176 He reacted first with the rhetorical shift, 158 00:09:04,176 --> 00:09:06,660 started talking about bad bankers and so on. 159 00:09:06,660 --> 00:09:11,565 And also a few policy suggestions that the financial industry didn't like. 160 00:09:11,565 --> 00:09:14,020 But he was supposed to be their man in Washington. 161 00:09:14,020 --> 00:09:15,920 They'd bought him and put him in. 162 00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:19,900 And the principal architects very quickly sent their instructions. 163 00:09:19,900 --> 00:09:25,140 They announced very publicly that they're shifting funds to the political opposition. 164 00:09:25,140 --> 00:09:29,607 And they poured money into crucial election in Massachusetts, 165 00:09:29,607 --> 00:09:34,535 which gave the Republicans the power to block any congressional legislations. 166 00:09:34,535 --> 00:09:36,591 An Interesting story in itself. 167 00:09:36,591 --> 00:09:39,416 And Obama got the message within days. 168 00:09:39,416 --> 00:09:42,000 Within days, he informed the business press 169 00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:45,550 that bankers are, I'm quoting now, "are fine guys." 170 00:09:45,550 --> 00:09:48,445 He singled out for praise the chairmen of chairs 171 00:09:48,445 --> 00:09:53,670 of the JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, the two biggest players. 172 00:09:53,670 --> 00:09:56,520 And he assured the business world as he put it that, 173 00:09:56,520 --> 00:10:02,058 "I, like most of the American people, don't begrudge people's success or wealth." 174 00:10:02,058 --> 00:10:07,069 He's referring to the huge bonuses and profits that are infuriating the public. 175 00:10:07,069 --> 00:10:11,450 "That's part of the free market system," Obama continued. 176 00:10:11,450 --> 00:10:14,763 Not inaccurately as free markets are interpreted 177 00:10:14,763 --> 00:10:17,410 in state capitalist doctrine. 178 00:10:17,410 --> 00:10:23,257 It's a very revealing snapshot of the Smith's maxim in action. 179 00:10:24,534 --> 00:10:28,000 Well, with Adam Smith's crucial corrective in mind, 180 00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:30,000 let's take another look at the global system. 181 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:31,840 See what's happening to it. 182 00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:34,630 There is a real shift of power across the world, 183 00:10:34,630 --> 00:10:38,650 namely, from the workforce to transnational capital. 184 00:10:38,650 --> 00:10:41,510 And China does play a big role in it. 185 00:10:41,510 --> 00:10:46,961 It's basically the assembly plant for a regional production system. 186 00:10:46,961 --> 00:10:51,000 Japan, Taiwan, other Asian economies 187 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:55,310 export high-tech parts and components to China, 188 00:10:55,310 --> 00:10:58,740 and China assembles and exports them 189 00:10:58,740 --> 00:11:03,264 using its advantages of extremely cheap and highly repressed labor and land. 190 00:11:04,972 --> 00:11:08,970 There's much concern about the trade deficit with China, 191 00:11:08,970 --> 00:11:10,750 -- US trade deficit. 192 00:11:10,750 --> 00:11:12,820 Which is in fact huge and growing. 193 00:11:12,820 --> 00:11:17,769 But there’s less attention to the fact that there's a compensating factor 194 00:11:17,769 --> 00:11:22,725 that trade deficit with Japan and the rest of Asia have sharply declined, 195 00:11:22,725 --> 00:11:26,690 as the new regional production system takes place. 196 00:11:26,690 --> 00:11:29,974 And US manufacturers are following the same course. 197 00:11:29,974 --> 00:11:32,900 They're providing parts and components for China 198 00:11:32,900 --> 00:11:36,900 to assemble and export back to the United States often 199 00:11:36,910 --> 00:11:40,480 for the financial institutions and the retail giants 200 00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:46,450 and the ownership and management of manufacturing industry. 201 00:11:46,450 --> 00:11:49,762 And the sectors closely related to this nexus of power. 202 00:11:49,762 --> 00:11:52,940 It's heavenly. That's also well understood. 203 00:11:52,940 --> 00:11:57,561 So the head of the very influential Sloan Foundation, 204 00:11:57,561 --> 00:12:03,050 Ralph Gomory, testified before Congress a couple years ago 205 00:12:03,050 --> 00:12:05,050 and he explained that, as he put it, 206 00:12:05,050 --> 00:12:11,140 "In this new era of globalization, the interests of companies and countries have diverged 207 00:12:11,140 --> 00:12:13,480 in contrast to the past. 208 00:12:13,480 --> 00:12:17,130 What is good for America's global corporations 209 00:12:17,130 --> 00:12:21,612 is no longer necessarily good for the American people." 210 00:12:21,620 --> 00:12:24,250 Take one striking illustration. 211 00:12:24,250 --> 00:12:27,440 Take IBM, peak of the computer industry. 212 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:31,997 Today it employs about 400,000 people 213 00:12:31,997 --> 00:12:37,579 in its facilities in the United States and its subsidiaries abroad. 214 00:12:37,579 --> 00:12:41,110 By now, employees within the United States 215 00:12:41,110 --> 00:12:44,654 have declined to about 30 percent. 216 00:12:44,654 --> 00:12:48,589 Many of the employees here are informed 217 00:12:48,589 --> 00:12:52,340 that they have to go abroad if they want to keep their jobs. 218 00:12:52,340 --> 00:12:56,370 Well, that's fine for IBM owners and directors, 219 00:12:56,370 --> 00:13:00,010 but it's grievous for the country as Adam Smith put it. 220 00:13:00,010 --> 00:13:05,578 And it's worth adding that IBM became the global giant in computing 221 00:13:05,578 --> 00:13:10,140 in large measure thanks to the magnificence of the US taxpayer 222 00:13:10,140 --> 00:13:14,672 who substantially funded the core of the IT revolution 223 00:13:15,657 --> 00:13:18,330 and most of the rest of the high-tech economy. 224 00:13:18,330 --> 00:13:20,650 But business is not philanthropy. 225 00:13:20,650 --> 00:13:25,250 Corporations are dedicated to maximizing profit and market share. 226 00:13:25,250 --> 00:13:28,120 In fact, that's a legal obligation for management. 227 00:13:28,120 --> 00:13:32,204 So it's not good for the country. It’s too bad. 228 00:13:32,204 --> 00:13:36,700 Well, China became the world's assembly plant. 229 00:13:36,700 --> 00:13:41,521 The Chinese workers are suffering along with the rest of the global workforce. 230 00:13:41,521 --> 00:13:44,149 And it's just as we would anticipate in a system 231 00:13:44,149 --> 00:13:47,841 that's designed to concentrate wealth and power, 232 00:13:47,841 --> 00:13:52,550 and to set working people in competition with one another worldwide. 233 00:13:52,550 --> 00:13:57,510 Worldwide the share of workers and national income has been declining 234 00:13:57,510 --> 00:13:59,770 but dramatically so in China, 235 00:13:59,770 --> 00:14:02,930 maybe more than anywhere else close to it, 236 00:14:02,930 --> 00:14:09,640 which is also leading to growing unrest in this highly inegalitarian society 237 00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:12,220 one of the most inegalitarian in the world, 238 00:14:12,220 --> 00:14:17,298 and capable of considerable violence to suppress dissent. 239 00:14:17,298 --> 00:14:20,890 Well, there's a good deal more to say about all of this 240 00:14:20,890 --> 00:14:29,106 but just to summarize with few salient points from a much more complex reality. 241 00:14:29,106 --> 00:14:33,651 There are indeed very important shifts in global power. 242 00:14:33,651 --> 00:14:37,500 And if we escape from the doctrinal framework, 243 00:14:37,500 --> 00:14:39,650 we can see what they are. 244 00:14:39,650 --> 00:14:44,510 There's a shift from the general population worldwide 245 00:14:44,510 --> 00:14:48,230 to the principal architects of the global power system 246 00:14:48,230 --> 00:14:53,430 that's pretty much as what any rational person would expect, 247 00:14:53,430 --> 00:14:58,421 particularly when in an era -- reffering now to the West 248 00:14:58,421 --> 00:15:01,206 particularly the United States and Europe -- 249 00:15:01,206 --> 00:15:07,384 large-scale depoliticization, undermining of functioning democracy. 250 00:15:09,077 --> 00:15:11,803 Where it goes from here depends on 251 00:15:11,803 --> 00:15:15,056 how much the great majority is willing to endure.