WEBVTT
00:00:02.250 --> 00:00:04.833
>> Vance Stevens: We're live!
00:00:04.833 --> 00:00:08.256
Hello, everybody. Somehow my video disappeared.
00:00:08.256 --> 00:00:12.643
It's there, but that's my - it's just an avatar format.
00:00:12.643 --> 00:00:13.201
[missed words]
00:00:13.201 --> 00:00:17.335
OK, well anyway, this is Vance Stevens in Abu Dhab... sorry, in L.A.
00:00:17.335 --> 00:00:20.140
I'm living in L.A. now, if you want to know where I'm living.
00:00:20.140 --> 00:00:21.533
Today is the 8th of December.
00:00:21.533 --> 00:00:25.155
They move me around so much, you know.
00:00:25.155 --> 00:00:30.064
And, anyway, it's the 8th of December 2013.
00:00:30.064 --> 00:00:33.420
We're talking with a good friend of mine, Phil Hubbard,
00:00:33.420 --> 00:00:38.039
from Stanford University in Palo Alto, California.
00:00:38.039 --> 00:00:44.940
And he's been doing some really neat stuff in Cal.
00:00:44.940 --> 00:00:48.606
I've known him for a long time in the Cal intersection Tea [missed words]
00:00:48.606 --> 00:00:50.243
>> Phil Hubbard: Since we were kids.
00:00:50.243 --> 00:00:53.546
>> Stevens: We were, 20 years ago
[Hubbard laughs]
00:00:53.546 --> 00:00:57.998
>> Hubbard: reaching 30 [check]
[background voice]
00:00:57.998 --> 00:01:03.036
>> Stevens: Someone has a -- someone needs to have a headset on.
00:01:03.036 --> 00:01:04.814
[missed words] is muted.
00:01:04.814 --> 00:01:10.499
Errh not sure: it could be someone listening to the stream.
00:01:10.499 --> 00:01:11.918
Yeah, if you're listening to the stream -- OK.
00:01:11.918 --> 00:01:13.499
Their call has gone away [check]
00:01:13.499 --> 00:01:15.047
Someone has corrected it, that's good.
00:01:15.047 --> 00:01:23.371
All right, well, OK. Someone has announced in the stream chat that they're listening to it there.
00:01:23.371 --> 00:01:25.999
So that's good, everything seems to be working.
00:01:25.999 --> 00:01:28.499
We're doing a Hangout on Air, as we often do.
00:01:28.499 --> 00:01:32.271
We're streaming it on webheadsinaction.org/live
00:01:32.271 --> 00:01:36.495
At the moment we have six people in the hangout,
00:01:36.495 --> 00:01:37.752
there's room for four more.
00:01:37.752 --> 00:01:41.914
So if anyone is listening on the stream and would like to join us, they can.
00:01:41.914 --> 00:01:47.998
And right now we've got Claire Siskin and Jim Buckingham, Rita Zeinstejer and
00:01:47.998 --> 00:01:59.105
let's see, and also Rob, Rob is there, and me, Vance Stevens. Rob Permanus, is that correct?
00:01:59.105 --> 00:02:05.665
Correct me if I'm wrong. Permanus, Permanus - how do you pronounce your name?
00:02:05.665 --> 00:02:09.245
>> Hubbard: You have to unmute him chuckles
00:02:09.245 --> 00:02:17.438
>> Stevens: it's Perhamus -- Perhamus, OK, Good, I'll never forget that again, all right.
00:02:17.438 --> 00:02:23.162
Thank you very much, Rob. Rob is an occasional participant in our hangouts.
00:02:23.162 --> 00:02:28.379
Well Phil, take it away and anybody who wants to --
00:02:28.379 --> 00:02:31.826
by the way, you're all muted by default when you come into the hangout.
00:02:31.826 --> 00:02:33.777
You can unmute yourself.
00:02:33.777 --> 00:02:39.071
If you're going to unmute yourself and talk, please mute yourself again,
00:02:39.071 --> 00:02:43.199
so we don't get keyboard noises and things like that.
00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:48.005
And there's Elizabeth Anne, also shown up from Grenoble in France.
00:02:48.005 --> 00:02:53.204
And Halima [check] in Tashkent has also joined us, I see.
00:02:53.204 --> 00:02:55.367
>> Hubbard [check] I think we're great, well, hello, everybody.
00:02:55.367 --> 00:02:59.136
It's Good Morning for me, a little early in the morning,
00:02:59.136 --> 00:03:04.035
but the sun is beginning to show through the back window here.
00:03:04.035 --> 00:03:08.669
Thank you all for being here from all over the world.
00:03:08.669 --> 00:03:18.079
What I wanted to do today is talk about largely an idea and a project that I've been working on
00:03:18.079 --> 00:03:21.585
for the last couple of years, very sporadically.
00:03:21.585 --> 00:03:25.410
Unfortunately I get interrupted easily, as I'm sure all of you do,
00:03:25.410 --> 00:03:35.897
so what started out as a -- what I hoped was going to be a much more robust collection of materials
00:03:35.897 --> 00:03:39.579
has turned out to be a little more anemic
00:03:39.579 --> 00:03:44.415
but I still think that I have enough here that I can demonstrate the idea
00:03:44.415 --> 00:03:48.710
and especially share my thoughts about how to go
00:03:48.710 --> 00:03:55.746
about dealing with this relatively new notion of curation,
00:03:55.746 --> 00:04:01.083
although in some ways, maybe it's just a label for an old notion that we've had for quite some time.
00:04:01.083 --> 00:04:06.463
So, let me give you a little bit of the background,
00:04:06.463 --> 00:04:10.592
like several of the things I've worked on in the last few years,
00:04:10.592 --> 00:04:12.663
like learner training.
00:04:12.663 --> 00:04:17.979
This is something that has emerged out of my classroom experience
00:04:17.979 --> 00:04:21.939
with an advanced listening and vocabulary class,
00:04:21.939 --> 00:04:27.321
and I see Vance is showing some of the slides now.
00:04:27.321 --> 00:04:36.856
The class is for graduate students at Stanford
00:04:36.856 --> 00:04:42.469
and it's a really nice sandbox for playing with ideas,
00:04:42.469 --> 00:04:48.099
because these are -- well, they're all in graduate school already,
00:04:48.099 --> 00:04:57.270
they're, for the most part, in the high 90's onwards to the 100s in the TOEFL iBT
00:04:57.270 --> 00:04:59.100
so they really are advanced in that sense.
00:04:59.100 --> 00:05:06.054
And many of them are taking the course because we require them to do it.
00:05:06.054 --> 00:05:08.050
So they're kind of a captive audience
00:05:08.050 --> 00:05:12.065
but it's also a small course: we have a maximum 14 students in it
00:05:12.065 --> 00:05:22.370
and it allows me to not only play around with ideas, but get a chance to talk to the students afterward,
00:05:22.370 --> 00:05:29.890
not usually with formal research, but just informally as part of our normal tutorial sessions
00:05:29.890 --> 00:05:35.036
and find out what they thought about them and what I can do to make them work a little better. [5:35]
00:05:37.512 --> 00:05:42.645
So, the problem that I noticed - an important part of this class
00:05:42.645 --> 00:05:45.288
is that students do independent projects
00:05:45.795 --> 00:05:52.906
and those independent projects are supposed to be for a minimum of three hours a week.
00:05:54.443 --> 00:05:59.941
Sounds like I am getting some echo in the background, but I will keep pushing through here..
00:06:00.510 --> 00:06:03.404
Uhh.. those projects are for three hours a week
00:06:03.404 --> 00:06:09.411
and they are responsible for doing the selection of the material
00:06:09.411 --> 00:06:14.913
with my help and with my guidance both before and after.
00:06:16.528 --> 00:06:23.328
And over the years, I have discovered that they are actually not really good at that.
00:06:23.328 --> 00:06:27.032
What they are good at is finding material that is interesting to them.
00:06:27.385 --> 00:06:31.478
But, they are not necessarily good at finding material that helps them.
00:06:32.585 --> 00:06:38.933
They discover that on their own a little bit down the road
00:06:38.933 --> 00:06:41.643
and often it doesn't become clear to both of us
00:06:41.643 --> 00:06:46.655
because I have a very slow learning curve and quickly forget things.
00:06:46.655 --> 00:06:50.816
So, I get to the end of the class and then I go
00:06:50.816 --> 00:06:53.945
"Oh, I should have provided them with a little more guidance.".
00:06:53.945 --> 00:06:56.410
So, about 2 years ago, I started doing this
00:06:56.410 --> 00:06:59.926
and it came as a juxtaposition of a couple of things.
00:06:59.926 --> 00:07:05.399
First of all, just my own general interest in the development of autonomy had been growing
00:07:06.275 --> 00:07:11.533
and as I have gone out and collected materials that I would just use in class,
00:07:12.086 --> 00:07:16.977
it was pretty clear to me that there is a huge amount of really interesting materials out there.
00:07:17.899 --> 00:07:20.553
And people have been collecting these for a while
00:07:20.585 --> 00:07:24.330
and teachers have been building lessons out of them
00:07:24.899 --> 00:07:27.055
-- sometimes pretty sophisiticated lessons --
00:07:27.516 --> 00:07:31.749
but I needed something that students could work with on their own.
00:07:32.241 --> 00:07:37.784
And so, I wanted to find a way to help them without just my advice
00:07:37.784 --> 00:07:41.513
as to how to look for materials, to actually start collecting materials
00:07:41.513 --> 00:07:44.729
in ways that would still give them quite a bit of freedom of choice
00:07:44.729 --> 00:07:52.101
but would also make it better as a language learning experience.
00:07:53.008 --> 00:07:58.163
As part of this course, they are also required to build vocabulary.
00:07:58.179 --> 00:08:02.794
They have to identify at least 35 new words and phrases every week,
00:08:02.794 --> 00:08:04.447
from the material they are using.
00:08:04.447 --> 00:08:07.488
So, this is a bit of the backdrop.
00:08:08.714 --> 00:08:14.115
In 2011, I came across a book, kind of independently.
00:08:14.115 --> 00:08:17.200
It was just recommended to me, for some reason, by Amazon:
00:08:17.200 --> 00:08:18.730
you know how that works.
00:08:19.360 --> 00:08:22.147
And the book was called 'Curation Nation'
00:08:22.147 --> 00:08:27.468
and there is, I think, a slide there perhaps somewhere, it's like the sixth slide.
00:08:29.268 --> 00:08:32.835
There's a -- if you want to pop that up.
00:08:32.835 --> 00:08:34.596
If not, it's just a picture of the book.
00:08:34.596 --> 00:08:36.357
But it's a book it's a book by Steven Rosembaum.
00:08:38.963 --> 00:08:38.963
>>Stevens: I will. Could I --
00:08:38.963 --> 99:59:59.999
>> Stevens: I am supposed to be able to mute mics, as the owner of the chat,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but I am unable to mute Halima's for some reason
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and that is where the echo is coming from.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, Halima, could I ask if you could click the "mute" on your mic when not speaking?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If you want to unmute, you can always speak to us.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That is where our echo is coming from.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Okay, I will do what Phil has asked me to do and pull up 'Curation Nation'.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
>> Hubbard: laughs Alright, thanks.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, anyway, this is not a book about education by any stretch.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It did come up with this notion that we have so much material on-line now
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and we are having so much difficulty in sorting out
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
what the good stuff is from the chaff, for any reason, for news and so on.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We have all these feeds:
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
those of you on Twitter or any of the other networks that have lots of feeds,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you get the -- even Google+ -- you get feeds from your friends,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you get feeds from people that whoever runs the site thinks might be interesting to you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and you are just overwhelmed with an enormous amount of material.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Some of it's pretty cool.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Much of it is stuff you wouldn't find on you own and that's great.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But when you've got the specific target of trying to improve your language
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
-- and of course, the group that I work with doesn't actually do a whole lot with social media
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because they don't have time as full-time graduate students --
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I am lucky if I can squeeze a few hours out of them to do the work
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that they need for the course that they are taking for credit from me.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, this notion of curation is based roughly on the idea of what people do in museums and in art galleries.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You get an expert, somebody who actually knows a fair amount about a particular area
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and you have that expert create collections, add value to them in one way or another,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and then you release those collections for the consumer - whoever it might be --
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to have a look at and to interact with.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, the key difference between this and what a lot of people are doing with this material /////
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
, you may have heard concepts like "digital curation", which can just mean curating digital materials but often means that computers are doing the job for you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
. Google news is a really good example of that. I find a lot of interesting stuff in there. I can even ask it to find particular categories
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
. But, it's still being selected without any human intervention. You compare that with something like Huffington Post, which is material
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that's been brought in by people who are, in some cases, they're producing it - but in other cases they are aggregating it and trying to make sense out of it for the rest of us.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, a key point here is that curation isn't the same as aggregation, or listing, or tagging. It's okay to use that term for that but
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that's not the way I am using it. There is a really nice quote in my slide there that.. I think it's maybe.. two more slides down, Vance.. One more. There you go.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Past curation.. yeah, that one. So this is - maybe it's a little mean, but I think it's right on point. When you just get collections of things, you've just got collections of things and its not
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
necessarily anything other than "these are things that I like" or "these are things that I think you will like". So, I prefer the next
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
slide.. you wanna go to it, Vance? This is more the way I see curation. Where you collect material, you organize it. There is even the potentially a path.. well, there is certainly paths through
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the individual material groups, and then mayble even a path through the groups - although at the moment I haven't done that last point.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, this is.. kind of captures the idea that I want to talk about today. Curation, importantly, is not the same as creation or recreation or adaptation or.. sampling, or synthesizing.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's taking the material and adding something to it. Maybe just a commentary. Maybe just collecting it into some logical framework or logical sequence.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, when I took that idea - which I was getting though the Curation Nation book, and though about it with respect to the material that I was using, I decided to experiment with that and come up with som
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
some collections of materials from.. as you probably know from the title, and the PDF, if you've had a look at it, comes from TED Talks. In a moment I will talk about why I think
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
TED talks is so good for that. At the base level, these were very popular with my students. What the students were doing is.. they were having trouble.. coming up with good ones. They would always pick what was
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
interesting and then often come back to me and say "Well, this was interesting, but I had trouble understanding it because my.. the accent of the speaker was not easy for me to understand.", or "I had trouble
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
understanding it because it was interesting because I didn't know anything about it and I didn't have the background so there was a whole bunch of new vocabulary."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It could be interesting for all sorts of reasons, but it wasn't interesting for the right reasons - for what we think is good for independent language learning.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Again, this doesn't mean that all of those collections with the help of a teacher, couldn't have been very valuable in a classroom and especially getting to the content for connecting discussions.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's not the same thing as letting students work on their own. So, I do want to emphasis that. My perspective here, at least initially, is getting students to be able to do these things
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
outside of class and then just come back and report on them rather than.. y'know, rather than having something we do in class or that everybody does the same homework assignment on.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Alright, so that's the set-up for what I believe curation should be, or at least can be, within this framework.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, what I think I will do is pause here and see if anybody has any questions.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we're live