1 00:00:06,351 --> 00:00:07,021 Have you ever seen 2 00:00:07,021 --> 00:00:10,301 a big, red "No Running" sign at a public pool? 3 00:00:10,301 --> 00:00:11,159 For the most part, 4 00:00:11,159 --> 00:00:13,438 the pace on the deck reflects this statement. 5 00:00:13,438 --> 00:00:15,532 But while the sign accurately describes 6 00:00:15,532 --> 00:00:16,925 the patrons' movements, 7 00:00:16,925 --> 00:00:18,491 isn't it true that people are walking 8 00:00:18,491 --> 00:00:21,290 because the sign tells them no running? 9 00:00:21,290 --> 00:00:24,171 So, is this sign portraying the pool's environment, 10 00:00:24,171 --> 00:00:25,763 or is it doing something else, 11 00:00:25,763 --> 00:00:27,932 something more powerful? 12 00:00:27,932 --> 00:00:30,600 The difference between a statement that describes 13 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:31,797 and one that commands 14 00:00:31,797 --> 00:00:35,553 is an idea developed by British linguist J. L. Austin. 15 00:00:35,553 --> 00:00:37,096 He defines this distinction 16 00:00:37,096 --> 00:00:39,316 as two separate parts of speech: 17 00:00:39,316 --> 00:00:40,267 constatives 18 00:00:40,267 --> 00:00:41,633 and performatives. 19 00:00:41,633 --> 00:00:42,995 Constatives are sentences 20 00:00:42,995 --> 00:00:45,274 that describe something as true or false, 21 00:00:45,274 --> 00:00:46,857 and performatives are sentences 22 00:00:46,857 --> 00:00:48,562 that denote an action. 23 00:00:48,562 --> 00:00:50,637 In other words, a constative is, 24 00:00:50,637 --> 00:00:52,546 and a performative does. 25 00:00:52,546 --> 00:00:55,329 To help us distinguish these two parts of speech, 26 00:00:55,329 --> 00:00:57,289 let's start by examining constatives 27 00:00:57,289 --> 00:00:59,457 around the park outside the pool. 28 00:00:59,457 --> 00:01:01,507 The first sign we encounter says, 29 00:01:01,507 --> 00:01:03,922 "The park closes at 6 p.m." 30 00:01:03,922 --> 00:01:06,345 After checking with a friendly park official 31 00:01:06,345 --> 00:01:08,682 that the park does, indeed, close at 6, 32 00:01:08,682 --> 00:01:10,067 we can confirm that this statement 33 00:01:10,067 --> 00:01:11,809 is a true constative. 34 00:01:11,809 --> 00:01:13,608 Nearby, there's a man on a bench 35 00:01:13,608 --> 00:01:15,731 with a newspaper, and the headline reads, 36 00:01:15,731 --> 00:01:17,016 "Heatwave!" 37 00:01:17,016 --> 00:01:20,024 However, the sky is cloudy and it feels quite chilly. 38 00:01:20,024 --> 00:01:22,522 Today's headline is a false constative 39 00:01:22,522 --> 00:01:24,859 as it has proven to be incorrect. 40 00:01:24,859 --> 00:01:26,781 Before the rain starts to fall, 41 00:01:26,781 --> 00:01:28,477 let's throw away our can of soda 42 00:01:28,477 --> 00:01:30,782 at the blue trash bin that says, "Recycle." 43 00:01:30,782 --> 00:01:32,067 It's a performative. 44 00:01:32,067 --> 00:01:33,565 Performatives are sentences 45 00:01:33,565 --> 00:01:35,823 that are meant to inspire actions. 46 00:01:35,823 --> 00:01:37,702 Rather than conveying a message, 47 00:01:37,702 --> 00:01:39,229 it acts upon the world, 48 00:01:39,229 --> 00:01:40,661 it does something. 49 00:01:40,661 --> 00:01:43,249 In this case, the performative of "Recycle" 50 00:01:43,249 --> 00:01:45,113 is requesting people to put their trash 51 00:01:45,113 --> 00:01:46,895 into the proper receptacle. 52 00:01:46,895 --> 00:01:49,258 Words not only bring about actions, 53 00:01:49,258 --> 00:01:51,732 sometimes words themselves are actions. 54 00:01:51,732 --> 00:01:54,484 This is what is known as speech acts. 55 00:01:54,484 --> 00:01:56,869 These actions include, but are not limited to, 56 00:01:56,869 --> 00:01:57,649 ordering, 57 00:01:57,649 --> 00:01:58,477 promising, 58 00:01:58,477 --> 00:01:59,436 apologizing, 59 00:01:59,436 --> 00:02:00,397 warning, 60 00:02:00,397 --> 00:02:01,279 sentencing, 61 00:02:01,279 --> 00:02:02,142 christening, 62 00:02:02,142 --> 00:02:03,781 and even marrying. 63 00:02:03,781 --> 00:02:06,147 Take a look at the wedding near the gazebo. 64 00:02:06,147 --> 00:02:08,532 The couple says the words, "I do." 65 00:02:08,532 --> 00:02:11,202 The speech act here are the words, "I do." 66 00:02:11,202 --> 00:02:13,623 These words cause them to marry one another. 67 00:02:13,623 --> 00:02:15,568 "I do" has acted upon them 68 00:02:15,568 --> 00:02:17,729 and profoundly changed their world. 69 00:02:17,729 --> 00:02:19,541 However, performatives depend 70 00:02:19,541 --> 00:02:21,327 on context and reception. 71 00:02:21,327 --> 00:02:23,820 These are known as felicity conditions. 72 00:02:23,820 --> 00:02:25,980 Imagine if the mayor showed up to the wedding 73 00:02:25,980 --> 00:02:28,145 and said, "By the power vested in me 74 00:02:28,145 --> 00:02:29,336 as mayor of the city, 75 00:02:29,336 --> 00:02:32,499 I name this gazebo 'The Mayor's Pizza Palace.'" 76 00:02:32,499 --> 00:02:34,097 His words would be a speech act 77 00:02:34,097 --> 00:02:35,927 by which he named the gazebo. 78 00:02:35,927 --> 00:02:37,520 And because he's the mayor, 79 00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:39,622 the gazebo would be known by its new name. 80 00:02:39,622 --> 00:02:41,366 But if someone who isn't the mayor, 81 00:02:41,366 --> 00:02:43,176 just a normal passerby, 82 00:02:43,176 --> 00:02:45,759 decides to name the gazebo after her favorite cat, 83 00:02:45,759 --> 00:02:48,381 the chances are the name would not change. 84 00:02:48,381 --> 00:02:50,630 Felicity conditions are the rules 85 00:02:50,630 --> 00:02:52,734 under which the performative can be enacted. 86 00:02:52,734 --> 00:02:54,540 These are fairly logical. 87 00:02:54,540 --> 00:02:56,904 The performative should have proper authority, 88 00:02:56,904 --> 00:02:58,037 it should be understood, 89 00:02:58,037 --> 00:02:59,229 it should be clear, 90 00:02:59,229 --> 00:03:01,483 and it should be able to be executed. 91 00:03:01,483 --> 00:03:04,152 If the performative doesn't meet these conditions, 92 00:03:04,152 --> 00:03:05,204 then it doesn't have the power 93 00:03:05,204 --> 00:03:07,114 to denote action. 94 00:03:07,114 --> 00:03:09,870 But just because a performative meets its conditions 95 00:03:09,870 --> 00:03:11,039 and is clearly stated, 96 00:03:11,039 --> 00:03:13,581 doesn't mean that it's implicitly followed. 97 00:03:13,581 --> 00:03:14,510 Back at the pool, 98 00:03:14,510 --> 00:03:17,455 a rowdy group of teenagers races to the high dive. 99 00:03:17,455 --> 00:03:19,087 "No running" does not seem 100 00:03:19,087 --> 00:03:20,422 to have power over them, 101 00:03:20,422 --> 00:03:22,056 and they'll have to face the consequences 102 00:03:22,056 --> 00:03:24,400 of breaking this performative. 103 00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:25,114 They may even have to force out 104 00:03:25,114 --> 00:03:27,560 some performatives of their own, 105 00:03:27,560 --> 00:03:28,705 such as apologizing to the life guard 106 00:03:28,705 --> 00:03:31,102 and promising to never run again. 107 00:03:31,102 --> 00:03:32,353 Maybe the life guard will respond 108 00:03:32,353 --> 00:03:33,639 with another performative, 109 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:35,652 sentencing them to be banished from the pool 110 00:03:35,652 --> 00:03:37,261 for the rest of the day. 111 00:03:37,261 --> 00:03:39,283 After all, these teenagers must learn 112 00:03:39,283 --> 00:03:41,568 to respect the power of words.