The flower-shaped starshade that might help us detect Earth-like planets

Astronomers believe that every star in the galaxy has a planet, one fifth of which might harbor life. Only we haven't seen any of them — yet. Jeremy Kasdin and his team are looking to change that with the design and engineering of an extraordinary piece of equipment: a flower petal-shaped "starshade" that allows a telescope 50,000 kilometers away to photograph planets. It is, he says, the "coolest possible science."

The universe is teeming with planets.

I want us, in the next decade,

to build a space telescope that'll be able to image

an Earth about another star

and figure out whether it can harbor life.

My colleagues at the NASA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory

at Princeton and I are working on technology

that will be able to do just that in the coming years.

Astronomers now believe that every star

in the galaxy has a planet,

and they speculate that up to one fifth of them

have an Earth-like planet

that might be able to harbor life,

but we haven't seen any of them.

We've only detected them indirectly.

This is NASA's famous picture of the pale blue dot.

It was taken by the Voyager spacecraft in 1990,

when they turned it around as
it was exiting the solar system

to take a picture of the Earth

from six billion kilometers away.

I want to take that

of an Earth-like planet about another star.

Why haven't we done that? Why is that hard?

Well to see, let's imagine we take

the Hubble Space Telescope

and we turn it around and we move it out

to the orbit of Mars.

We'll see something like that,

a slightly blurry picture of the Earth,

because we're a fairly small telescope

out at the orbit of Mars.

Now let's move ten times further away.

Here we are at the orbit of Uranus.

It's gotten smaller, it's got less detail, less resolve.

We can still see the little moon,

but let's go ten times further away again.

Here we are at the edge of the solar system,

out at the Kuiper Belt.

Now it's not resolved at all.

It's that pale blue dot of Carl Sagan's.

But let's move yet again ten times further away.

Here we are out at the Oort Cloud,

outside the solar system,

and we're starting to see the sun

move into the field of view

and get into where the planet is.

One more time, ten times further away.

Now we're at Alpha Centauri,

our nearest neighbor star,

and the planet is gone.

All we're seeing is the big beaming image of the star

that's ten billion times brighter than the planet,

which should be in that little red circle.

That's what we want to see. That's why it's hard.

The light from the star is diffracting.

It's scattering inside the telescope,

creating that very bright image

that washes out the planet.

So to see the planet,

we have to do something about all of that light.

We have to get rid of it.

I have a lot of colleagues working on

really amazing technologies to do that,

but I want to tell you about one today

that I think is the coolest,

and probably the most likely to get us an Earth

in the next decade.

It was first suggested by Lyman Spitzer,

the father of the space telescope, in 1962,

and he took his inspiration from an eclipse.

You've all seen that. That's a solar eclipse.

The moon has moved in front of the sun.

It blocks out most of the light

so we can see that dim corona around it.

It would be the same thing if I put my thumb up

and blocked that spotlight
that's getting right in my eye,

I can see you in the back row.

Well, what's going on?

Well the moon

is casting a shadow down on the Earth.

We put a telescope or a camera in that shadow,

we look back at the sun,

and most of the light's been removed

and we can see that dim, fine structure

in the corona.

Spitzer's suggestion was we do this in space.

We build a big screen, we fly it in space,

we put it up in front of the star,

we block out most of the light,

we fly a space telescope in
that shadow that's created,

and boom, we get to see planets.

Well that would look something like this.

So there's that big screen,

and there's no planets,

because unfortunately it doesn't
actually work very well,

because the light waves of the light and waves

diffracts around that screen

the same way it did in the telescope.

It's like water bending around a rock in a stream,

and all that light just destroys the shadow.

It's a terrible shadow. And we can't see planets.

But Spitzer actually knew the answer.

If we can feather the edges, soften those edges

so we can control diffraction,

well then we can see a planet,

and in the last 10 years or so we've come up

with optimal solutions for doing that.

It looks something like that.

We call that our flower petal starshade.

If we make the edges of those petals exactly right,

if we control their shape,

we can control diffraction,

and now we have a great shadow.

It's about 10 billion times dimmer than it was before,

and we can see the planets beam out just like that.

That, of course, has to be bigger than my thumb.

That starshade is about

the size of half a football field

and it has to fly 50,000 kilometers
away from the telescope

that has to be held right in its shadow,

and then we can see those planets.

This sounds formidable,

but brilliant engineers, colleagues of mine at JPL,

came up with a fabulous design for how to do that

and it looks like this.

It starts wrapped around a hub.

It separates from the telescope.

The petals unfurl, they open up,

the telescope turns around.

Then you'll see it flip and fly out

that 50,000 kilometers away from the telescope.

It's going to move in front of the star

just like that, creates a wonderful shadow.

Boom, we get planets orbiting about it.

(Applause)

Thank you.

That's not science fiction.

We've been working on this
for the last five or six years.

Last summer, we did a really cool test

out in California at Northrop Grumman.

So those are four petals.

This is a sub-scale star shade.

It's about half the size of the one you just saw.

You'll see the petals unfurl.

Those four petals were built by four undergraduates

doing a summer internship at JPL.

Now you're seeing it deploy.

Those petals have to rotate into place.

The base of those petals

has to go to the same place every time

to within a tenth of a millimeter.

We ran this test 16 times,

and 16 times it went into the exact same place

to a tenth of a millimeter.

This has to be done very precisely,

but if we can do this, if we can build this technology,

if we can get it into space,

you might see something like this.

That's a picture of one our nearest neighbor stars

taken with the Hubble Space Telescope.

If we can take a similar space telescope,

slightly larger,

put it out there,

fly an occulter in front of it,

what we might see is something like that --

that's a family portrait of our
solar system -- but not ours.

We're hoping it'll be someone else's solar system

as seen through an occulter,

through a starshade like that.

You can see Jupiter, you can see Saturn,

Uranus, Neptune, and right there in the center,

next to the residual light

is that pale blue dot. That's Earth.

We want to see that, see if there's water,

oxygen, ozone,

the things that might tell us that it could harbor life.

I think this is the coolest possible science.

That's why I got into doing this,

because I think that will change the world.

That will change everything when we see that.

Thank you.

(Applause)