Distorting Madonna in Medieval art - James Earle

View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/distorting-madonna-in-medieval-art-james-earle

After Rome was destroyed, people were wary of attachment to physical beauty. As Christianity gained traction, Romans instead began to focus on the metaphysical beauty of virtue, and art began to follow suit. James Earle discusses how Medieval paintings of Madonna were affected by this shift.

Lesson by James Earle (https://www.youtube.com/user/AmorSciendi), animation by Hero 4 Hire Creative.

Ever see a medieval painting of baby Jesus

sitting or standing on his mother's lap

and wonder why she's so large?

Paintings like Cimabue's enthroned Madonna with angels

or Duccio's Maesta

also appear out of proportion.

If Mary were to stand up, it seems,

the angels in the picture would be as tall as her shin bone,

and her torso would be disproportionately small

when compared to her legs.

Maybe you thought the artist simply wasn't skilled enough

to paint realistically

or lacked the mathematical skill of perspective.

But that's not the full story.

To understand why, we need to go back

to the late fifth century

when the city of Rome was attacked by the Goths.

Rome was built in marble and meant to last forever.

It represented, for many years,

the pinnacle of human civilization,

so its destruction left a huge void.

Theologians, who preached about a world beyond the physical,

began attracting an audience as Rome crumbled,

and Christianity started to fill the void left by the Empire.

As a replacement for the physical beauty of Rome,

Christianity offered a metaphysical beauty of virtue

and an eternal heaven

that could not be destroyed as Rome had.

After the fall of Rome,

early medieval theologians turned away from physical beauty,

rejecting it in favor of inner-beauty.

They maintained that while the physical world was temporary,

virtue and religion were permanent.

Beautiful objects could lead to a misguided worship of the object

rather than the worship of goodness.

It is said that the early sixth century preacher, St. Benedict,

upon thinking of a beautiful woman,

threw himself into a thorn patch,

and through his suffering,

regained his focus on spiritual beauty.

He feared his desire for the beautiful woman

would distract him from his desire to love God.

As European civilization transitioned away from empires

and towards religion,

monasteries became the gatekeepers of knowledge,

which meant that classical books

that praised physical pleasures

were not copied or protected.

Without protection, they became the victims of natural decay,

fire,

flooding,

or pests.

And without the help of monks transcribing new copies,

these texts and the philosophies they carried

disappeared in Western Europe

and were replaced by the works of people like St. Benedict,

which brings us back to these depictions of Jesus and Mary.

Because Christianity had so fervently rejected physical beauty,

these medieval artists purposefully avoided

aesthetically pleasing forms.

At first, decorations for churches or palaces

were limited to interesting geometric patterns,

which could be pleasing

without inspiring sinful thoughts of physical pleasure.

As the medieval period progressed,

depictions of Jesus and Mary were tolerated,

but the artist clearly made an effort to veil Mary

and give her disproportionately large legs,

with those enormous shin bones.

The fear remained that a beautiful illustration of Mary

might inspire the viewer to love the painting

or the physical form of Mary,

rather than the virtue she's meant to represent.

So even though it may be fun to think we can paint

more realistically than Cimabuey or Duccio,

we need to remember that they had different goals

when picking up a paintbrush.